American Federation of State County Loca Municipal Employees
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 930232284
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Portland, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5037994749
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $358,598
- Expenses
- $428,647
- Assets
- $974,321
- Liabilities
- $7,270
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
33 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- HILARY ZUST (VICE PRESIDENT)
- JACQUELINE TATE (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- HILARY ZUST (VICE PRESIDENT): $27,930 total reported compensation
- GRANT SWANSON (SECRETARY): $14,784 total reported compensation
- CINDY SIERRA (TREASURER): $13,617 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The objectives of this local union shall be to carry out on a local basis the objectives of the american federation of state, county and municipal employees and the mission of the local.
What it reported doing in 2025
To advocate for working conditions, rates of pay, benefits and pensions for our members by negotiating and enforcing strong contracts.to build and model workplace democracy and sustain respectful workplace environments.to confront and challenge when employees are treated without respect.to provide excellent service to the public; the best value for the taxpayer dollar.to have an inclusive union with members who are engaged in an effective structure.to build and support an educated, strong and effective shop steward structure.to promote open communication, including the utilization of interactive information sharing technology.to be a positive presence in the community where we work, live and play.to be informed and active in politics, as they impact workers in both local, state, national and international issues and campaigns.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 93% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 75
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 79.5%; rating input score 80; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -19.5%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.27; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.9%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -39.3% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 28 of 32 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $28K · 33 people listed
- Consistency: 11 of 12 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 25 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 41/100.