American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees Afl-cio Council 48
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 390918495
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2015
- Forms available
- Form 990 2015
- Location
- Madison, WI, USA
- Phone
- 4143446868
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Labor Unions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $348,932
- Expenses
- $368,677
- Assets
- $606,959
- Liabilities
- $15,202
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BRIAN STAFFORD (PRESIDENT)
- KEN WISCHER (VICE PRESIDENT)
- JOE NARLOCK (VICE PRESIDENT)
- MONICA HOGANS (VICE PRESIDENT)
- DANIEL PANOWITZ (VICE PRESIDENT)
- NADINE EWERT (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- MARIE NOTH (STAFF REPRESENTATIVE): $46,569 total reported compensation
- PENNI SECORE (STAFF REPRESENTATIVE): $43,399 total reported compensation
- BRIAN STAFFORD (PRESIDENT): $2,734 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Council 48 provided collective bargaining, education, legislation and labor activities for its local unions and members of those locals.
What it reported doing in 2015
Council 48 provided collective bargaining, education, legislation and labor activities for its local unions and members of those locals through may 31, 2015.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 60% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 23
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: Limited
- Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -5.7%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.65; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 26.5%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -22.2% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -25.8% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 5 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $47K · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 10 of 10 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2010 to 2015
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 13 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 9 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 49/100.