American Federation of Government Employees Local 1127

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
273389750
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2011
Location
Milwaukie, OR, USA
Phone
5037936660
Rating
41
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$190,058
Expenses
$153,310
Assets
$241,830
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • REBECCA WOLF (PRESIDENT)
  • TANJA FOWLER (REGIONAL VICE PRESIDENT FOR UTAH)
  • TRANG KIM (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • CAMERON COCHEMS (REGIONAL VICE PRESIDENT FOR IDAHO)
  • SAMANTHA DOLLENS (REGIONAL VICE PRESIDENT FOR OREGON)
  • BARBARA HANSON (REGIONAL VICE PRESIDENT FOR MONTANA AND WYOMING)

People named in this filing

  • DONALD J THOMPSON (TREASURER)
  • DENISE RODRIGUEZ (SECRETARY)
  • REBECCA WOLF (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Represented local union members in various labor/management relations, grievances, terminations, and daily conflicts or interactions.

What it reported doing in 2025

Represented 780 local union members in various labor/management relations grievances, terminations, and daily conflict or conversation. Negotiated and completed a collective bargaining agreement and new pay structure and have increased enrollment in our local by 80 percent.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 64
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 19.3%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.58; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 35.2%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.7% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12.3% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 20 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.