American Federation of Government Employees

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
486142863
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Fort Leavenworth, KS, USA
Phone
9136845251
Rating
35
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$46,709
Expenses
$44,407
Assets
$9,586
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Audrey Harris (President-Treasurer)
  • Janice L Jackson (Executive Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Audrey Harris (President-Treasurer)
  • Janice L Jackson (Executive Vice President)
  • Katherine E Woods (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Organizations Primary exempt purpose is because this is a Labor Organization For Federal Government Employees that represent bargaining and non-bargaining employees and it is not for profit but it is a nonprofit organization

What it reported doing in 2025

The Union work with the Fort Leavenworth Agency in providing Government Employees with the guidance and advice these Federal Government Employees need in the performance of their assigned duties. If an employee request representation then the AFGE Local 738 provides many services to government employees in representing them in investigations, grievances, personnel matters, and all issues that pertains to their employment

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 84% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 45
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.9%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.22; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -13.7% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -29.2% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 53/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.