American Fed of State Cnty and Muni Dba 328 or Health Sciences Univ Emp
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 930902056
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Portland, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5039640799
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,132,133
- Expenses
- $881,227
- Assets
- $3,610,871
- Liabilities
- $87,904
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
33 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JENNIE S OLSON (PRESIDENT)
- JENNIFER LAVERDURE (VICE-PRESIDENT)
- PATRICIA CRABB (VICE-PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- JENNIE S OLSON (PRESIDENT): $11,400 total reported compensation
- CASSIE BARTON (SECRETARY): $9,000 total reported compensation
- CLAIRE IRVAN (TREASURER): $9,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Member services - labor union. Afscme local 328 is a local union affiliated with Oregon council 75 of hte american federation of state, county and municipal employees; the organization afl-cio; and the northwest Oregon labor council afl-cio.
What it reported doing in 2024
Afscme local 328 carries out on a local basis the objectives of afscme which are as follows: a. To promote the organization of workers in general and public employees particular.b. To promote the welfare of the membership and to provide a voice in the determination of the terms and conditions of employment. We are committed to the process of collective bargaining as the most desirable, democratic and effective method to achieve this. Both as union members and citizens, we shall also employ available legislative and political action.c. To promote job security by opposing efforts to outsource the work of our members.d. To promote civil service legislation and career service in government.e. To provide research and educational services and activities designed to assist members and affiliates.f. To foster cooperation among affiliates.g. To cooperate with other labor organizations in particular and other segments of our society in general towards the end that the material riches of american society be more justly distributed and the moral promise of american life be realized.h. To work with our brothers and sisters in other lands towards the improvement of the condition of life and work in all countries, towards the diminution of international tensions and reduction in the use of armed force to resolve disputes, and towards genuine solidarity of all workers.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 89
- Accountability: 77
- Sustainability: 74
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 95.3%; rating input score 95; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 22.2%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.1; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.4%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 23 of 23 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $11K · 33 people listed
- Consistency: 11 of 12 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 52/100.