American Council on Science and Health

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
132911127
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
301-980-4579
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$795,857
Expenses
$1,086,809
Assets
$539,083
Liabilities
$56,975

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • THOMAS DJ GOLAB (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • HENRY MILLER (DISTINGUISHED FELLOW): $170,385 total reported compensation
  • THOMAS DJ GOLAB (PRESIDENT): $160,136 total reported compensation
  • JONATHAN BLOOM (DIR. OF CHEM. & PHARM. SCI): $143,313 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

ACSH was created to be the science alternative to 'news' that is often little more than hype based on exaggerated findings. We help policymakers see past scaremongers and activist groups who have targeted GMOs, vaccines, conventional agriculture, nuclear power, natural gas, and 'chemicals,' while peddling health scares and fad diets. We fight back against activists who have attacked the credibility of the overwhelming consensus of academic and private sector scientists who dispute their claims, undermining the integrity of the scientific enterprise.

What it reported doing in 2024

Acsh achieves its mission through ongoing general educational programs and activities that include: producing peer-reviewed publications; producing and distributing a daily e-news brief and feed that presents acsh's scientific perspective on current and/or emerging health and science-related news stories, events and/or medical breakthroughs; producing informative video commentaries, podcasts, and films; writing op-eds, commentaries and letters-to-the editor that are published in leading national and local newspapers, popular magazines and/or journals; hosting an educational website at acsh.org that provides scientific assessments of current trends and studies in health and medicine, and free download of acsh scientific publications; appearing on radio and tv to dispel myths and confront controversies head on; cultivating partnership opportunities with like-minded institutions and organizations; providing oral and written testimony at regulatory and legislative hearings and forums; hosting social media portals and channels on youtube, x/twitter, instagram, spotify, linkedin, and facebook.highlights of the 2025 fiscal period: 1) published more than 590 articles on our www.acsh.org website. In fy 2025, our website had nearly 1 million unique visitors and more than 2 million page views. Published more than 156 issues of our dispatch daily and 51 issues of our weekend dispatch edition e-newsletters that are read by nearly 16,000.2) promoted its scientific conclusions on current public health topics related to food and nutrition, chemicals and the environment, biology and biotech, health and medicine, harm reduction, disease, neuroscience and social sciences, parents and children.3) partnered with organizations to reach broader audiences, such as: agbioworld, atlantic legal foundation, black valley films, board on environmental studies and toxicology, cato institute, center for consumer freedom, the center for countering digital hate, center for truth in science, competitive enterprise institute, consumers' research council of america, council for agricultural science and technology, fgs global, genetic literacy project, the heritage foundation, immunologic, national association of scholars, pearson education, pm 2.5 group, realclearhealth, realclearpolicy, realclearscience, stanford university school of medicine, and university of California, berkeley.4) published numerous health and science editorials and commentaries in major, popular newspapers and online journals read by millions, such as usatoday, issues & insights, philadelphia inquirer, the wall street journal, the baltimore sun, the New York times, bloomberg business week, the Washington times, the Washington examiner, law360, harvard bill of health newsletter, New York times, npr, New York post, chicago times, boston globe, and others. Through these commentaries and mentions in articles acsh's reach was more than 3 billion people.5) appeared on radio and tv media to publicize acsh's scientific positions on programs such as lars larson (weekly appearance on a syndicated radio show), john batchelor cbs eye on the world (nationally syndicated), mark hahn kscj radio, and others. We reached nearly 5 million through broadcast media such as television, radio, and podcasts.6) our experts met with policymakers in the executive and legislative branches of the federal government. In addition, we testified before agency panels and congressional committees, including: centers for disease control, drug enforcement administration, the environmental protection agency's clean air scientific advisory committee, food and drug administration, and others.7) promoted acsh's conclusion via social media and internet outreach activities that reach millions of online users via acsh.org website; our acsh dispatch e-news briefs; the distribution of informative video commentaries on acsh youtube channel "matter of facts;" facebook pages (the general acsh.org page and others related to vaccine and immu

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 79
  • Accountability: 94
  • Sustainability: 14
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 70.5%; rating input score 70
  • Fundraising efficiency: $5.63 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -36.6%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.5; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 55.8%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -4.7% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -4.8% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -11.8% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 70.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 9 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $766K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $170K · 12 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 21/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.