American Council on Germany Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 131889074
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2128263636
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Promotion of International Understanding
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,133,153
- Expenses
- $2,588,022
- Assets
- $18,356,836
- Liabilities
- $1,983,487
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
43 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEVEN E SOKOL (PRESIDENT AND CEO)
- KAREN FUREY (VICE PRESIDENT)
- MICHELE R STEINBUCH (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- STEVEN E SOKOL (PRESIDENT AND CEO): $432,574 total reported compensation
- KAREN FUREY (VICE PRESIDENT): $243,284 total reported compensation
- ROBERT L FENSTERMACHER (CHIEF CONTENT OFFICER): $178,930 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The american council on germany (acg) is an independent, nonpartisan nonprofit organization that was founded in 1952 to strengthen german-american relations. Through a range of programs and activities, the acg works across generations to provide a deeper, more nuanced understanding about germany, europe, and the importance of the transatlantic partnership.
What it reported doing in 2024
Supplemental fellowships: the american council on germany's fellowships provide an opportunity for american and german journalists, scholars, and professionals to embark on a transformative journey across the atlantic. These fellowships offer a chance to explore how key issues are tackled in different cultural and political contexts, fostering valuable insights that span continents. Since 1976, over 1,200 individuals have expanded their horizons both personally and professionally through the council's prestigious fellowship programs.mccloy fellowships on global trends focus on crucial topics such as national security, urbanization, climate change, sustainability, digitalization, public health, and vital financial issues like inflation, trade, and global supply chains. Fellows engage in cutting-edge research, exploring the shared concerns of both sides of the ocean.dr. Richard m. Hunt fellowships for the study of german politics, society, and culture are designed to support outstanding american academics whose research shapes the understanding of contemporary german society, politics, and cultural history. Anna-maria and stephen m. Kellen fellowships give berlin-based journalists from print, broadcast, and digital media the opportunity to travel to the united states toconduct in-depth interviews with policymakers and thought leaders, gathering insights for impactful news reports and research.study tours and fact-finding missionsfor over 30 years, the american council on germany has arranged in-depth fact-finding missions for practitioners and experts to travel across the atlantic to meet with their professional counterparts and exchange best practices. Through study tours and leadership missions, the acg provides the opportunity to engage in dialogue with officials, business leaders, journalists, and other experts and better understand the political, economic, social, and environmental landscape on either side of the atlantic. In 2025, the acg organized five immersive study tours on a range of topics, including education, agricultural policy, and social cohesion; and had a major focus on the challenges facing local communities vying to be the location for the development of semi-conductor fabrication centers.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 98
- Sustainability: 68
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77%; rating input score 77
- Program expense ratio: 78.7%; rating input score 79
- Fundraising efficiency: $14.42 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 97%; rating input score 97; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 17.4%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.09; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 43.9%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 77% of revenue deployed · 78.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 32 of 33 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $433K · 43 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 38 of 38 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 7 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 50/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 57/100.