American Council on Education
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 530196573
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Aug 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 202-939-9340
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $34,285,159
- Expenses
- $41,333,907
- Assets
- $93,542,895
- Liabilities
- $22,337,990
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
45 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- THEODORE MITCHELL (PRESIDENT, EX OFFICIO)
- JESSIE BROWN (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- THEODORE MITCHELL (PRESIDENT, EX OFFICIO): $1,031,089 total reported compensation
- ANNE MEEHAN (ASST VP, GOVT RELATIONS (TO 8/2024)): $556,559 total reported compensation
- PETER MCDONOUGH (GENERAL COUNSEL): $440,514 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
ACE is the nation's leading membership organization for higher education, representing over 1,700 colleges and universities.
What it reported doing in 2024
Professional development programsace connect serves as ace's central hub for community strategy and engagement, building partnerships and fostering collaboration across the higher education ecosystem. Through signature networks, strategic convenings, and digital engagement tools, ace connect creates spaces for leaders to share expertise, strengthen relationships, and advance solutions to the sector's most pressing challenges.as the unit responsible for ace's major convenings, ace connect leads the planning and execution of the ace experience, ace's flagship event series with its annual meeting as the featured centerpiece of engagement. The ace experience convenes nearly 700 higher education leaders for dialogue on critical issues shaping the future of the sector and, beyond the annual meeting, features components such as ace on the hill, the university network summit as a partner conference, the ace women's network leadership conference, and the council of fellows gathering. All these combine to elevate the ace experience as a catalyst for collaboration, advocacy, and innovation.ace connect also manages three cornerstone communities: -the ace council of fellows (cof), representing alumni of the ace fellows program, a leadership development initiative with more than 2,000 graduates since 1965. The cof convenes fellows annually and provides ongoing opportunities for peer learning and engagement, including a special gathering during the ace experience 2026. -established in 1977 the ace women's network, a system of state-based networks reaching thousands of women and allies annually, dedicated to diversifying the leadership pipeline. The women's network leadership conferenceheld during the ace experiencerecently surpassed its registration goal, underscoring the continued demand for gender-focused leadership development. -the commission on faith-based colleges and universities, which convenes leaders from faith-based institutions to address shared challenges and opportunities. In 2025, the commission convened over 130 presidents and leaders. Its third annual meeting, scheduled for june 8, 2026, will introduce a new forum for general counsels to explore legal issues unique to faith-based campuses, strengthening institutional resilience and compliance strategies.to extend the reach of these efforts, ace connect leverages ace engage, ace's digital platform for virtual networking and learning. Through webinars, workshops, and a robust resource library, ace engage complements in-person convenings and publications such as the recent white paper, dual mission institutions: bridging traditional and workforce learning for regional impact, which generated significant engagement within weeks of release.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 77% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 81
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 81.8%; rating input score 82
- Program expense ratio: 62.8%; rating input score 63
- Fundraising efficiency: $4.86 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 82.8%; rating input score 83; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -20.6%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.26; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.24; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.8%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.3% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3.5% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0% per year; rating input score 100; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 81.8% of revenue deployed · 62.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 29 of 29 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 6 filed program accomplishments · $26M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1M · 45 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $787K reported
- Consistency: 38 of 39 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 13 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 20/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 53/100.