American Council of Engineering Companies
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 880232385
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Las Vegas, NV, USA
- Phone
- 7028775633
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $156,801
- Expenses
- $134,483
- Assets
- $88,106
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SYNDI DUDLEY (PRESIDENT)
- SHANE DYER (PRESIDENT EL)
People named in this filing
- SYNDI DUDLEY (PRESIDENT)
- SHANE DYER (PRESIDENT EL)
- DAVID DODSON (VICE PRESIDE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
American council of engineering companies of Nevada (acec Nevada) was formed in 1964 as a not-for-profit, voluntary, self-governing organization, incorporated under the laws of the state of Nevada to: -protect the public -ensure ethical and professional standards. -promote harmony, cooperation and mutual understanding among independent consulting engineers engaged in private practice -cooperate with other organizations, public agencies, and clients on issues affecting the engineering community or general public -promote the professional and economic welfare of the members comprising the council -act as a clearing house and information center between members on all matters of mutual interest, and between members and the general public advise on enactment of pending legislation affecting the interest of the public and independent consulting engineers.
What it reported doing in 2024
Providing educational conferences and seminars, legislative monitoring and representation and low cost insurance for its member firms.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 14.2%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.66; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 39.3%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -1.3% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -5.1% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.