American Construction Inspectors Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 330260711
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- Sacramento, CA, USA
- Phone
- 6267972242
- Rating
- 61
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Service Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $32,403
- Expenses
- $42,536
- Assets
- $30,718
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CINDY WEIDNER (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- CINDY WEIDNER (PRESIDENT)
- GEORGE VANDUSEN (VICE PRESIDE)
- THOMAS DURBROW (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization was able to provide members with the resources to promote the education of the same group through the publications of informational periodicals, newsletters, manuals of practice for inspectors and other education materials; and to test and register inspectors to determine that they possess a minimum level of the skill and knowledge required to practice as a construction inspector in order to assure the public that buildings and lifeline infrastructures have been constructed to the standards of safety provided for in all applicable federal, state and local codes and to the design requirements of the plans and specifications.
What it reported doing in 2024
Educational seminars: to provide opportunities for construction inspectors and other related construction industry people to expand and maintain their professional and technical skills and knowledge in order to provide better services to the general public. Business meetings: construction inspectors met to exchange technical skills and professional experiences and experts from the general business construction sector are invited to make technical presentations and share their experiences.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 51
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 56.4%; rating input score 56
- Program expense ratio: 43%; rating input score 43
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -31.3%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.72; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -7.9% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -7% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 56.4% of revenue deployed · 43% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $18K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 56/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 43/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.