American Conservation Film Festival Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 043720399
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2017, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Shepherdstown, WV, USA
- Phone
- 3018768442
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Film, Video
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $101,712
- Expenses
- $102,226
- Assets
- $100,496
- Liabilities
- $10,963
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DENNIS LIU (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DENNIS LIU (PRESIDENT)
- CAROLYN THOMAS (VICE PRESIDE)
- MARK BURGESS (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The american conservation film festival promotes outstanding films and the arts to educate and inspire people to become engaged in conservation issues.
What it reported doing in 2024
The american conservation film festival was held at the 400 seat frank center on the shepherd university campus. The event offered 28 films (including one oscar-nominated short) in ten screenings across a four-day weekend in march. Every film had open-captions in order to be accessible to the deaf and hard of hearing communities. The festival brought in fifteen special guest speakers and five awards were given to filmmakers along with cash prizes. Audience attendance returned to pre-pandemic levels. During the festival, acff worked to promote a spirit of community to reconnect after the pandemic. To start, acff held a free, guided hike at a local nature preserve followed by a free lecture on appalachian biodiversity and resiliency in the mountain state. A large room adjacent to the theater was rented and area conservation nonprofits came to set up exhibits to engage the public. As a culminating event for the festival, special guests and audience members joined together for a community dinner at the appalachian restaurant, alma bea and were encouraged to discuss their favorite films. Acff creates several opportunities to foster youth engagement during the calendar year, as well as at the festival. In the fall, local conservation filmmakers designed and taught a free, next gen filmmaker workshop for students in grades 5-9 at the shepherdstown library. This allowed them to gain valuable skills to create and enter a short film in acffs next generation capture conservation contest. The contest granted four awards to student filmmakers under the age of 18 along with cash prizes totaling 550. The winning high school team got to have their film screened during the festival. Additionally, all festival screenings are made free for students 18 and under and college students with id. Acff staff worked with the environmental studies department of shenandoah university to allow students to review festival films and put on a best of fest event in october for students and the general public. Throughout the year, we also screened films at the barns of rose hill in berryville, va, at the oak spring garden foundation in upperville, va, at docweek middleburg in va and more locally at the national conservation training center, the shepherdstown public library, and morgan grove park
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 75% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 42
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.5%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 84.1%; rating input score 84
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.5%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.98; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.5% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.9% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 84.5% of revenue deployed · 84.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $86K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 15 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 23/100.