American Concrete Pipe Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
923454246
IRS 990 coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Phone
4355906162
Rating
49
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Reported finances

Revenue
$273,173
Expenses
$213,090
Assets
$138,288
Liabilities
$11,159

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JEFF PECK (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • TREVOR MCDONALD (DIRECTOR): $105,364 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mountain states concrete pipe association promotes the positive qualities of precast concrete pipe and box and serves as the leading resource, voice, and advocate for industry stakeholders in the development of long-lasting, resilient, and durable infrastructure that helps build sustainable communities for current and future generations in Utah and Idaho.

What it reported doing in 2025

Annual members meeting: organized an annual meeting for members to discuss industry trends, share best practices, and network with peers. About 50 attendees. Key topics included: presenting the service award to honor an individual that significantly contributed to the local industry; recognizing associate member suppliers and vendors to foster a more open, competitive market; organizing a golf networking event to show appreciation to the production crews of the producer member companies; provide a dinner banquet to conduct association business and outline the planned marketing and educational association events for the upcoming year. This activity is to show recognition and appreciation to the members of the association and help them network within the industry. Monthly industry meetings: organized monthly meetings with industry representatives to discuss industry and market trends, and tailor education and marketing initiatives to further the association mission. This involved three to 11 members of the board and keeps the producer members engaged in the association's activities. Marketing events: conducted various marketing events such as 5 golf tournaments, 6 plant open houses, and sponsorships of other events to promote the benefits of industry products. These events provide touchpoints for the association to build awareness, connect with, and establish and strengthen relationships with the market. The golf and open house events touch about 1,000 market contacts. These contacts are more likely to reach out to the association to take advantage of our educational resources. Educational events: hosted educational events including 5 regional trainings/workshops, 5 conference presentations, a dozen lunch and learns, and many individual activities/ visits. These events carry out our mission to provide education for the market in building long-lasting, durable infrastructure. 1,500 participants look forward to our engaging presentations, enjoy sitting down with us over lunch, and/or sharing their insights with us and other participants on the industry and best practices. These activities help specifiers correctly incorporate industry products into their designs and projects, help installers work with and install industry products correctly, help inspectors confidently test and evaluate industry products, and help all others better understand the industry. Research: from time to time, conduct research in the industry to keep the producer members competitive with current technologies and to help the market understand new technologies related to the industry. No significant research has been conducted yet.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 22%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.65; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 49.4%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 36.7% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $105K · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 11 of 12 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.