American Concrete Pavement Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 362548294
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Rosemont, IL, USA
- Phone
- 8479662272
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,409,289
- Expenses
- $3,485,103
- Assets
- $1,693,261
- Liabilities
- $368,357
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
26 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LAURA O'NEILL (PRESIDENT & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- LAURA O'NEILL (PRESIDENT & CEO): $417,600 total reported compensation
- ANDREW GIERALTOWSKI (COO / SECRETARY): $232,142 total reported compensation
- SARAH DALTON (SENIOR DIRECTOR, ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION): $202,120 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Acpa promotes and protects concrete pavement markets through technical services, education, advocacy, marketing, and industry leadership. Acpa engineers provide high quality technical services to members and to state, federal, and local agencies, acpa's marketing and advocacy efforts expand the awareness of concrete pavements and their durability, sustainability, and resiliency, as well as push for funding for research to develop new concrete pavement technologies. Yearly events connect members to timely educational workshops, networking, and expert sessions. Acpa is a proven leader in the industry, pursuing the advancement of more sustainable and resilient concrete pavement nationwide.
What it reported doing in 2025
Technology transfer including newsletters, publications and training to disseminate information on concrete pavement and the concrete pavement industry.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 66% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 19
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.2%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.49; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.22; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 29.6%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 22 of 22 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $418K · 26 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 12 of 12 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.