American College of Surgeons Michigan Chapter

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237182541
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Batavia, IL, USA
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$190,528
Expenses
$134,014
Assets
$293,856
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Elango Edhayan MD FACS (President)
  • Heather Dolman MD FACS (President-elect)
  • Erin Perrone MD FACS (Immediate Past-President)

People named in this filing

  • Elango Edhayan MD FACS (President)
  • Heather Dolman MD FACS (President-elect)
  • Nicholas Mouwad MD FACS (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Continuing education for surgeons

What it reported doing in 2025

The Michigan Chapter American College of Surgeons supported member participation in the American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress a national educational meeting designed to advance surgical knowledge professional development and collaboration among surgeons and other healthcare professionals. Participation in Clinical Congress allowed Chapter members and representatives to engage in continuing surgical education clinical and non-clinical programming CME opportunities surgical innovation research updates and professional networking. This activity furthered the Chapters exempt purpose by promoting high standards of surgical care education and professional advancement within the surgical community. Program expenses related to this activity totaled $8,518.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 61
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 78
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 52.6%; rating input score 53
  • Program expense ratio: 74%; rating input score 74

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 29.7%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.19; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 52.6% of revenue deployed · 74% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $99K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.