American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 900489809
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2026385577
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $63,505,977
- Expenses
- $63,278,795
- Assets
- $93,212,684
- Liabilities
- $23,666,055
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
58 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- IFFATH ABBASI HOSKINS MD (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT (THRU 05/24))
- STELLA MARIE DANTAS MD (PRESIDENT)
- STEVEN JAY FLEISCHMAN MD (PRESIDENT ELECT)
- VERDA JOSEPHINE HICKS MD (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT (THRU 05/24))
- SANDRA E BROOKS MD (BOARD MEMBER/ EVP & CEO (THRU 12/24))
- CHRISTIE ALLEN (VICE PRESIDENT QUALITY IMPROVEMENT & PROGRAMS)
Highest reported compensation
- CHRISTOPHER ZAHN (CHIEF CLINICAL PRACTICE (THRU 08/24)): $807,643 total reported compensation
- ANNAMARIE CONNOLLY (CHIEF OF EDUCATION AND ACADEMICS AFFAIRS): $538,333 total reported compensation
- MOLLY MEEGAN (CHIEF LEGAL OFFICER): $451,090 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
ACOG’s purpose-driven members are at the forefront of obstetric and gynecologic care. Mission ACOG’s mission is to support our members to improve the lives of all people seeking obstetric and gynecologic care, their families, and communities. ACOG’s mission is to support our members to improve the lives of all people seeking obstetric and gynecologic care, their families, and communities. Vision ACOG’s vision is an equitable world in which exceptional and respectful obstetric and gynecologic care is accessible to all.
What it reported doing in 2024
Support of profession - includes the functions necessary to address and satisfy the many divergent needs of the organization's membership and our public programs. These functions include various areas of the organization that are necessary for the dissemination of information to our membership and support of the profession.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 76% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 98
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 6 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: 68.8%; rating input score 69; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 96.8%; rating input score 97; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.4%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.47; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.25; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.1%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 11.6% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 30 of 31 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $808K · 58 people listed · 6 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.1M reported
- Consistency: 13 of 14 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 53 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.