American College of Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 481084233
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Turnersville, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 8563553299
- Rating
- 90
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $169,925
- Expenses
- $177,217
- Assets
- $227,391
- Liabilities
- $120,607
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LORI D OSOWSKI CHS (PRESIDENT/CHANCELLOR ELECT)
- ELAINE FORREST O'SHIELDS CHS CHT (PRESIDENT ELECT)
- KATHERINE GIOVETSIS (CEO)
People named in this filing
- SHALINI PEREIRA PHD FACHI (IMMEDIATE PAST PRES/CHANCELLOR)
- WALTER HERCZYK CHS (MEMBER AT LARGE)
- LORI D OSOWSKI CHS (PRESIDENT/CHANCELLOR ELECT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The american college of histocompatability and immunogenetics is a certifying board offering voluntary credentialing examinations in the field of histocompatibility and immunogenetics.
What it reported doing in 2024
The american college of histocompatibility and immunogenetics (achi) is a certifying board offering voluntary credentialing examinations in the histocompatibility and immunogenetics. Achi provides certification and promotes continuing education for histocompatibility and immunogenetics professionals. The board is sponsored by the american society for histocompatibility and immunogenetics (ashi).
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4.3%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.28; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.53; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.5% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $177K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 23/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.