American College of Clinical Pharmacology Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 221950891
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2025
- Location
- Ashburn, VA, USA
- Phone
- 2403999070
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,799,207
- Expenses
- $1,977,686
- Assets
- $10,616,101
- Liabilities
- $304,473
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
22 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DIONNA GREEN MD (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
- NAVI GOYAL PHD (PRESIDENT ELECT)
- OLIVER GRUNDMANN PHD (PRESIDENT)
- KRISTA L LEVY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- KRISTA L LEVY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $220,127 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To improve global health by advancing the frontiers of clinical pharmacology. Vision: to be the premier educational and scientific network of clinical pharmacology professionals in all stages of career development and practice areas. The american college of clinical pharmacology (accp) aims to advance the science of clinical pharmacology in all its phases and to engage in educational efforts in the interest of members, the clinical pharmacology community, and the public. This aspiration is to be attained in a manner consistent with the highest ethical and scientific standards.
What it reported doing in 2025
To enhance the knowledge, skills and professional practice of physicians, scientists, pharmacists and other healthcare professionals who are involved in drug development and the evaluation and/or treatment of patients. The education program is designed to help physicians, scientists, pharmacists and other healthcare professionals focus on quality improvement and practice evidence-based medicine in the development and evaluation of pharmaceuticals and biologics and the delivery of patient-centered care.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 83% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 52
- Transparency & Controls: 77
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 74
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 58%; rating input score 58
- Program expense ratio: 58.4%; rating input score 58
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 29.3%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.37; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.1%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 58% of revenue deployed · 58.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 20 of 20 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $220K · 22 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 58/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.