American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Iowa

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
421002093
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Des Moines, IA, USA
Phone
5152433988
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public, Societal Benefit

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,832,633
Expenses
$1,636,956
Assets
$3,139,283
Liabilities
$692,871

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

25 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • GILLER ANDY (PRESIDENT)
  • STRINGER MARK (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • STRINGER MARK (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $169,849 total reported compensation
  • AUSTEN RITA BETTIS (LEGAL DIRECTOR): $157,575 total reported compensation
  • MCROBERTS PETER (POLICY DIRECTOR): $134,204 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The foundation works to defend and promote the constitution of the united states, focusing especially on the first, fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, and 14th amendments. The foundation also works to defend and promote the constitution of the state of Iowa. It accomplishes these objectives through litigation and legal advocacy as well as through public education and outreach all done to secure and advance the civil liberties values which are reflected in those and other amendments and provisions of the constitution

What it reported doing in 2024

Legal program services: (1) litigated constitutional challenge to Iowa's criminal reentry law, the worst anti-immigrant bill in state history, obtaining preliminary injunction. (2) filed class action lawsuit challenging unconstitutional jail fees in black hawk county, Iowa. (3) litigated constitutional challenge to Iowa school book ban law, including its don't say lgbtq+ and forced outing components, on appeal of a preliminary injunction, and back before the district court on remand. (4) litigated constitutional challenge to Iowa's abortion ban, taking effect around six weeks, before many women even know they are pregnant. (5) filed three prisoner state disciplinary post-conviction relief cases for Iowa inmates subjected to unreliable drug testing and the alarmingly low some evidence burden of proof required to convict an inmate of a disciplinary violation resulting in loss of earned time and loss of access to rehabilitative programming. (6) filed emergency litigation to protect naturalized u.s. Citizen voters in Iowa from Iowa secretary of state directive to challenge them, at the polls or when voting absentee, based on only their previous status of having been lawful permanent residents at the time they obtained their driver's licenses, despite the state's knowledge that the vast majority of those challenged voters had become naturalized u.s. Citizens since that time, and were thus eligible to vote. In bringing the litigation, we successfully pressured the secretary to back off some of the most extreme aspects of his initial order. (7) other legal advocacy to protect voters ahead of 2024 general election, directing letters to all 99 Iowa county auditors and the Iowa secretary of state asking them to reject all mass challenges filed within 90 days of the election, and to restore any voters improperly removed from the lists. (8) amicus briefs filed in Iowa supreme court cases, arguing: a warrant supported by probable cause is required prior to conducting a search of a renter-occupied property when the renter does not consent to the search; court fees must not be imposed in dismissed criminal cases. (9) amicus briefs filed in federal court cases, arguing: the eighth amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishments does not allow cities to issue fines or arrest people for sleeping outside in public when they have no access to adequate shelter; the right of students to receive information about race discrimination in schools is entitled to protection under the first amendment; an eeoc regulation including accommodations related to miscarriage and abortion were properly within required protections against discrimination on account of pregnancy.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 52
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 64.6%; rating input score 65
  • Program expense ratio: 71.8%; rating input score 72
  • Fundraising efficiency: $6.2 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 10.7%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.92; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.22; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 38.5%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 12.7% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.8% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.8% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 64.6% of revenue deployed · 71.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $170K · 25 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 23/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 30/100.