American Campaign for Prevention of Child Abuse and Family Violence Dba NCC AFV

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
954356014
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2023
Forms available
Form 990 2021, Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Arlington, VA, USA
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$43,029
Expenses
$40,899
Assets
$636
Liabilities
$100

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Alan Davis (Chairman and CEO)
  • Mary-Ellen Rood (President)
  • Garrick Davis (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Alan Davis (Chairman and CEO)
  • Mary-Ellen Rood (President)
  • Garrick Davis (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We provide local community private sector support services and prevention treatment referral information to individuals of all ages in all the fifty states and U.S. Territories whether victims or perpetrators family violence child abuse and neglect domestic violence - spouse partner abuse or elder abuse and neglect.

What it reported doing in 2023

Upon our founding 40 years ago in 1984 we launched and have continued providing a national helpline manned by qualified trained volunteers available 24 hours daily seven days every week who provide referrals and guidance to callers seeking local prevention and shelter resources. We also assist other national state and local hotlines and helplines by taking challenging calls they have either referred or actually transferred to us.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 96
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 93.9%; rating input score 94
  • Program expense ratio: 98.8%; rating input score 99

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.02; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -4.4% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -2.4% per year; rating input score 0; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -20.1% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 93.9% of revenue deployed · 98.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 6 filed program accomplishments · $40K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2016 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.