American Board of Spine Surgery Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
330751630
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Riverside, CA, USA
Phone
3106998390
Rating confidence
Limited

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$241
Expenses
$1,583
Assets
$46,258
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

People named in this filing

  • ALI ARAGHI MD (DIRECTOR)
  • REGINALD J DAVIS MD (DIRECTOR)
  • FERNANDO G DIAZ MD (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To serve and protect the public, physicians and medical centers by: 1) determining the minimum, general education and training standards for those individuals who seek certification in spine surgery. 2) determining initial and continuing professional qualifications of applicants for certification; conducting regular examinations of those applicants found to be eligible and qualified; issuing certificates to those applicants who successfully complete such examinations; and 3) maintaining a registry of the holders of active and lapsed certificates issued by the american board of spine surgery, inc.

What it reported doing in 2024

The board maintains a website for the education of the public about spine surgery and for the information of spine surgeons relating to the activities of the board and other issues of interest to spine surgeons.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -556.8%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 29.22; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -17.7% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.7% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.