American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 416029315
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Rochester, MN, USA
- Phone
- 5072821776
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $8,013,419
- Expenses
- $7,174,208
- Assets
- $20,032,447
- Liabilities
- $45,398
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
27 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CAROLYN L KINNEY MD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- CAROLYN L KINNEY MD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $635,768 total reported compensation
- DAN AGENTEN (DIRECTOR OF TECHNOLOGY): $230,787 total reported compensation
- PAUL ZOBITZ (DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS): $208,328 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the american board of physical medicine and rehabilitation (abpmr) is to serve the public by improving the quality of patient care in physical medicine and rehabilitation (pm&r). This is accomplished through a process of certification and continuing certification that fosters excellence and encourages continuous learning.
What it reported doing in 2024
The abpmr supports and serves the physicians who have gained or are working to achieve board certification in pm&r. This starts by ensuring high-quality residency training and culminates in a rigorous and reliable two-part examination to achieve board certification. Once certified, a physician is called a diplomat of the abpmr.the abpmr's work continues throughout a physiatrists career with our maintenance of certification (moc) program, which provides a framework and tools for maintaining medical knowledge and skills, as well as tracking continuous imrpovement over time. The american board of physical medicine and rehabilitation (abpmr) offers certification examinations. The three largest program services offered by the abpmr are the part i, and part ii examinations. The number of persons to benefit from the exams for 2025 are as follows: part i - 607part ii - 543
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 92% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 77
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10.5%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.79; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 35.9%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $636K · 27 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $154K reported
- Consistency: 12 of 13 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 12 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.