American Board of Pediatrics Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 561520520
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Phone
- 9199290461
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Nonprofit Management
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $433,936
- Expenses
- $899,573
- Assets
- $5,092,528
- Liabilities
- $350,665
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHAEL A BARONE (PRESIDENT/CEO Beginning March 2024)
- JOHN A BARNARD MD (FORMER INTERIM PRESIDENT/CEO THROUGH MARCH 2024 and 2024 CHAIR)
- JUDY SCHAECHTER MD MBA (FORMER PRESIDENT & CEO -THROUGH JUNE 2023)
Highest reported compensation
- MICHAEL A BARONE (PRESIDENT/CEO Beginning March 2024): $684,415 total reported compensation
- ANN E HAZINSKI MBA CPA (EX OFFICIO VP FINANCE AND CFO): $575,296 total reported compensation
- JOHN A BARNARD MD (FORMER INTERIM PRESIDENT/CEO THROUGH MARCH 2024 and 2024 CHAIR): $287,596 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See schedule o
What it reported doing in 2024
Support for pediatric research, pediatric organizations, and pediatric meetings involving parents, mental health and residency training
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 91% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 68
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 94.5%; rating input score 95
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 98.1%; rating input score 98; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -107.3%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.66; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 15%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.6% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.9% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.5% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 94.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 9 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $850K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $684K · 12 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $1.1M reported
- Consistency: 22 of 23 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 29/100.