American Board for Transplant Certification

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
481058372
IRS 990 coverage
2017–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Mount Laurel, NJ, USA
Phone
8564374662
Rating confidence
Limited

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,023,724
Expenses
$918,738
Assets
$1,861,267
Liabilities
$131,501

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CHAD MUSE (PRESIDENT)
  • KATHERINE ROBINSON (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
  • DARYLE M BLACKSTOCK (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
  • ROB TEASTER (PRESIDENT EMERITUS)

People named in this filing

  • CHAD MUSE (PRESIDENT)
  • KATHERINE ROBINSON (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
  • GINGER DELARIO (SECRETARY/TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Abtc's purpose is to award a voluntary, non-governmental certification credential, cctc, cptc, cctn, ctp or ctfc to qualified transplant coordinators, transplant nurses or transplant financial coordinators who have successfully passed the certification exam, which represents a standard of competence.

What it reported doing in 2024

Abtc offers the following certifications: certified clinical transplant coordinator (cctc), certified procurement transplant coordinator (cptc), certified clinical transplant nurse (cctn), certified transplant preservationist (ctp). And certified transplant financial coordinator (ctfc): use of cerftification credentials attests to the transplant community and the public that the individual has met a standard of competency and possesses the necessary knowledge and skills needed to provide quality care for transplant donors.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 63
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 10.3%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.03; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 12.6% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.2% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 15 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $440K reported
  • Consistency: 11 of 11 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.