American Association of University Women Redlands Branch
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 954073359
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Redlands, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9093624599
- Rating
- 54
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $105,912
- Expenses
- $90,568
- Assets
- $110,267
- Liabilities
- $293
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- EILEEN SANBORN (PROGRAM VICE PRESIDENT)
- HEATHER ABUSHANAB (PRESIDENT)
- AMY BISEK (CO-PRESIDENT ELECT)
- KATHRYN BROWN (CO-PRESIDENT ELECT)
People named in this filing
- TWILLEA EVANS-CARTHEN (MEMBER AT LARGE)
- LISA MCCARTY (MEMBER AT LARGE)
- ELLEN TIMOTHY (MEMBER AT LARGE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The aauw redlands branch provides programs and events within redlands California area as well as events for aauw national organization in keeping with the organizational mission to advance equity for women and girls through advocacy, education, philanthropy and research.
What it reported doing in 2024
Science, technology, engineering & math (stem)conference for the pass area program. The conference was presented to 80 students, 8 speakers, 18 volunteers and 10 public school staff participants.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 82% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 26
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 64
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 25.1%; rating input score 25
- Program expense ratio: 29.3%; rating input score 29
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 14.5%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.22; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.8% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 25.1% of revenue deployed · 29.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 8 filed program accomplishments · $27K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 25/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 29/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 48/100.