American Association of Kidney Patients Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
112306416
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Tampa, FL, USA
Phone
8136368100
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Kidney Disease

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,435,680
Expenses
$2,505,870
Assets
$4,541,577
Liabilities
$1,278,845

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Richard Knight (Past President)
  • Edward V Hickey III (President)
  • Jennifer L Jones (Vice President)
  • Diana Clynes (Executive Director)

Highest reported compensation

  • Diana Clynes (Executive Director): $225,292 total reported compensation
  • Erin Kahle (Deputy Director): $163,318 total reported compensation
  • Jerome Bailey (Director of Patient Engagement): $138,500 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

See Schedule O

What it reported doing in 2024

Patient Information and Education AAKP firmly believes, as research has also shown, that patient and family member/caregiver education is an integral part of treatment and enhancing quality of life. Not educating a patient and their care partner about their condition and treatment options leaves the patient at risk for complications as well as the possibility of not selecting a course of treatment best suited for them. Education is a simple and effective way to improve overall health and achieve better outcomes.In the same vein, AAKP is uniquely positioned to ensure the patient has a central role in research and other activities that are designed to determine optimal approaches and strategies for providing healthcare services, assistance programs, access to new products and services, etc. AAKP constituents represent all ages, modalities, ethnicities, disease states, and a variety of demographic indicators. AAKP's research capabilities have grown rapidly, and the Association has created a sophisticated database and expansive social media channels which allow AAKP to better connect and learn from its constituents. In turn, AAKP provides education to patients and caregivers on what it means to be involved in research initiatives as well as opportunities to get involved. From online surveys, interviews, focus groups, and clinical trial awareness campaigns - AAKP is focused on inserting important patient insight and preferences into research to help inform innovation, advance care, and make a meaningful impact to improve lives - this means AAKP members are helping shape the future policies and discoveries that characterize kidney care! AAKP is known within the renal community as a leader in quality education; taking time to produce programs and materials that are current, relevant and address the most pressing issues patients and their families face. AAKP is deliberate in its development of educational programs, working closely with its Medical Advisory Board, health educators and fellow patients to create unbiased, reliable resources that are easily understood and beneficial to patients. AAKP routinely uses matrices to measure program outcomes to assess effectiveness and success as well as opportunities for enhancement. The AAKP fulfills our educational mission through an extensive patient education program to inform and educate kidney patients, their families, and the general public on kidney diseases. To meet the needs of all individuals, AAKP offers its programs in a variety of mediums: print, web-based and live (in-person). AAKP services more than one million individuals annually via its various educational programs and communication platforms. AAKP's bimonthly magazine, aakpRENALIFE, averages more than 400,000 readers/views annually and includes information about the latest news, education, policy/legislative issues, innovations/research occurring in the kidney community and patient/caregiver/living donor profiles. The magazine is also distributed to over 7,000 dialysis centers nationwide and has a substantial afterlife as it remains in dialysis centers for quite some time after mailing. aakpRENALIFE is available via print/digital medium and is archived on www.aakp.org for a term of one year.AAKP's monthly e-newsletters, collectively, were delivered more than 250,000 times during this year - including aakpRENALFLASH (designed for individuals on dialysis); Kidney Transplant Today (designed for individuals with or interested in a kidney transplant); Kidney Beginnings (designed for and new patients learning more about their disease; At Home with AAKP (designed for individuals on or interested in home dialysis therapies) and AAKP Pediatric Kidney Patients (designed for peds, adolescents and their families). AAKP hosts its monthly HealthLine and HealthLine Innovator webinar series for patients and the public on timely and relevant topics such as managing risk factors for kidney disease (diabetes/hypertension); understanding dialys

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 83
  • Transparency & Controls: 73
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 85.7%; rating input score 86
  • Program expense ratio: 82.8%; rating input score 83
  • Fundraising efficiency: $35.01 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2.9%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.81; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.28; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 21%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.2% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.9% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 16.8% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 85.7% of revenue deployed · 82.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $2.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $225K · 19 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $333K reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 24/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.