American Adjuster Association Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
844092558
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Denver, CO, USA
Phone
3037480321
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Mutual/Membership Benefit N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$46,450
Expenses
$41,668
Assets
$41,799

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Caeden Tinklenberg (President)
  • John Wood (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Caeden Tinklenberg (President)
  • John Wood (Vice President)
  • Adam Lewis (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of American Adjuster Association, Inc is to educate property owners, elected officials, and the press that an insured must beafforded cost balanced representation in the claim process.

What it reported doing in 2024

Modified membership categories (Subscriber, Individual, State Adviser, National Adviser), amended the bylaws, established the official association address, modified the mission statement to more clearly reflect the purpose of the association, finalized all 990 forms since inception, engaged a lobbyist in Texas, developed an amicus brief for Florida Supreme Court, held board elections for 2025 and 2026 (two-year terms), began identifying topics for position papers/white papers, website updates.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 10.3%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -44% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -38.9% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -13.9% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.