American Academy of Family Physicians Sc Chapter

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
570372530
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Laurens, SC, USA
Phone
8649847237
Rating
62
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$478,391
Expenses
$466,997
Assets
$895,524
Liabilities
$310,784

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

29 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PAQUITA P TURNER (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT)
  • R MICHAEL BRYANT (PRESIDENT)
  • JEROME AYA-AY (PRESIDENT ELECT)
  • J BURTON BANKS (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • PAQUITA P TURNER (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT): $106,050 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the South Carolina academy of family physicians is to improve the health care of all south carolinians through supporting and repesenting the specialty of family medicine.

What it reported doing in 2024

Annual Assembly- The programming, developed by the SCAFP Continuing Professional Development Committee, provides family physicians and other clinicians with targeted continuing medical education designed for direct application in daily practice. Each session includes defined objectives to ensure participants gain practical, actionable understanding. Topics included: Evidence based Lifestyle Principles for Improved Health and Well being, Population Health Mgmt., Initiating Basal Insulin and Overcoming Treatment Hesitancy, Evidence based Drug Therapy Update and AI Innovations & Implications in Family Medicine. A two hour controlled substance session, Balancing Relief & Risk: Confronting the Duality of Chronic Pain and Opioid Addiction (Parts I & II), addressed prescribing and monitoring controlled substances. Additional offerings included a Point of Care Ultrasound workshop and a Heart Disease KSA working group for board recertification.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 76% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 40
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 42
  • Sustainability: 42
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 45.5%; rating input score 46
  • Program expense ratio: 43.7%; rating input score 44
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.4%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.92; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.35; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 22.7%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.1% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 45.5% of revenue deployed · 43.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 28 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $204K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $106K · 29 people listed
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 46/100.
  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 44/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 14/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.