American Academy of Family Physicians Idaho Chapter

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237014787
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Boise, ID, USA
Phone
2083231156
Rating confidence
Limited

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$256,126
Expenses
$258,161
Assets
$274,757
Liabilities
$4,211

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

25 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CRYSTAL PYRAK MD (PRESIDENT)
  • ANGIE DEVITT MD (PRESIDENT ELECT)
  • JOHN WILLIAMS MD (PAST PRESIDENT/ALTERNATE DELEGATE)
  • TERRY ELIZABETH WOODRUFF (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • TERRY ELIZABETH WOODRUFF (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $114,769 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the Idaho academy of family physicians is to advocate for Idaho family physicians and their patients. The Idaho academy of family physicians is committed to quality health care, education, and advocacy on behalf of Idaho's family physicians and their patients.

What it reported doing in 2024

In 2024 the iafp held a legislative reception where we shared information about the benefitsof graduate medical education in Idaho. We featured three resident members that plan tostay in Idaho to practice after residency and featured two of our physician membersdiscussing our policy priorities.the iafp launched a workforce and rural support committee and a climate health andsustainability committee. We identified priorities in these areas of work and started offeringcontent and programming in these topics to our members.we conduced extensive work to support the delivery of quality health care to pregnantwomen in Idaho.in fall of 2024, we visited medical students in the wwami program and the icom program todiscuss the benefits of family medicine and recruit these students into the specialty. We heldmember events during the aafp's fmx event in anaheim and the ima's house of delegatesevent in sun valley. We shared information with members about our work, future priorities, and upcoming educational opportunities.in the spring of 2024, we held an in-person annual conference attended by over 100 of ourmembers in ketchum, id. We offered 12.5 continuing medical education (cme credits) overtwo days. In addition to virtual cme in our monthly grand rounds, and special presentations, we supported the primary care matters conference for members in northern Idaho inseptember 2024.we provided seven scholarships to medical students to attend the aafp's nationalconference and identified two resident members to represent us at the resident congress.we issued a quarterly hard copy journal, sent twice monthly enews communications, andhosted a website with current member resources.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 80
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 77.9%; rating input score 78; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.8%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.06; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 44.5%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 21 of 21 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $115K · 25 people listed
  • Consistency: 10 of 11 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes grants
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.