American Academy of Developmental Medicine and Dentistry
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 010751843
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Prospect, KY, USA
- Phone
- 8452048004
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Research Institutes and/or Public Policy Analysis
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $987,871
- Expenses
- $873,229
- Assets
- $550,273
- Liabilities
- $44,424
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DIAN CHIN KIT-WELLS DDS (PRESIDENT)
- VINCENT SIASOCO MD (PRESIDENT ELECT)
- CARL TYLER MD (PAST PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DIAN CHIN KIT-WELLS DDS (PRESIDENT)
- VINCENT SIASOCO MD (PRESIDENT ELECT)
- CARL TYLER MD (PAST PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provides multiple online and in-print continuing education activities for physicians and dentists.
What it reported doing in 2025
The aadmd provided multiple online and in-print continuing education for physicians and dentists. Aadmd provided multiple speaking engagements, hosting and attending conferences related to the development of curriculum standards for physician and dentist education. Education was provided to over 5,000 health professionals treating patients with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.8%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 93.6%; rating input score 94
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11.6%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.63; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.9% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.7% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.4% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.8% of revenue deployed · 93.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 21 of 21 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $818K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 21 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $158K reported
- Consistency: 17 of 18 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 37/100.