American Academy of Craniomaxillofacial Surgeons Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
844131666
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Buford, GA, USA
Phone
7702710453
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Professional Societies, Associations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$14,030
Expenses
$5,525
Assets
$190,578
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOHN CACCAMESE (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
  • ZACHARY PEACOCK (PRESIDENT - ELECT)
  • JASJIT DILLON (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • SHAHID AZIZ (TRUSTEE)
  • ANTHONY MORLANDT (TRUSTEE)
  • MARTIN STEED (TRUSTEE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of this organization is to provide assistance to organizations that offer continuing education in relation to oral and craniomaxillofacial surgeons or assistance to oral and craniomaxillofacial surgeons who need continuing education. The organization strives to improve the quality of continuing education available to oral and craniomaxillofacial surgeons, improve the quality of care by oral and craniomaxillofacial surgeons, and provide support for oral and craniomaxillofacial surgeons new to practice or experiencing financial difficulties that would prevent them from participating in continuing education courses.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 67% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 74
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 88
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 59.3%; rating input score 59
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 60.6%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 34.49; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -37.9% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -75.2% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 29.7% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 59.3% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $6K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.