America's Agenda Health Care for All
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 200682634
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2022231585
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $16,130,288
- Expenses
- $15,862,001
- Assets
- $5,278,211
- Liabilities
- $63,288
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
24 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DOUGLAS DORITY (PRESIDENT/CHAIR)
- MARK BLUM (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- MARK BLUM (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $400,871 total reported compensation
- DOUGLAS DORITY (PRESIDENT/CHAIR): $213,591 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To organize, educate, and build consensus among a wide range of labor, business, health care, citizen groups, and other diverse interests in support of adoption of health care policies that will assure affordable access to high quality health care for all americans.
What it reported doing in 2024
During the course of 2024, america's agenda ("aahca") continued our ongoing work to build and strengthen broad citizen coalitions that unite businesses, labor unions, and other stakeholders in effective advocacy to achieve reforms that will assure that every american has affordable access to high-quality healthcare. As the cost of prescription drugs has emerged as the fastest-growing component of overall health costs, aaha has adopted reduction of prescription drug costs as a high priority concern and focus of aahca activity. Aahca-organized advocacy campaigns have resulted in enactment of america's agenda-designed strategies to reduce prescription drug costs and capture substantial savings for patients, taxpayers, state government, and public employees in several states across the country. Each of our aahca state campaigns has built on the success of our policy initiative in New Jersey, where implementation of the america's agenda-designed public policy strategy for creating a dynamically competitive marketplace for pharmacy benefit managers captured $2.52 billion in prescription drug savings over 5 years for state taxpayers and the New Jersey state employees health plan. Aahca's federal medicare reform advocacy initiative aims to eliminate perverse prescription benefit manager (pbm) incentives to provide medicare participants higher, rather than lower, priced drugs and prevent pbm conflicts of interest that drive costs higher for america's seniors.the following examples highlight accomplishments of continuing aahca advocacy initiatives over the course of 2024: - in Colorado, during 2024, aahca expanded our advocacy coalition of Colorado citizen organizations that had built the momentum leading to the 2022 enactment of Colorado's competitive pharmacy benefits manager marketplace act. The expanded coalition united around core principles for a broader public and private sector prescription drug market reform with the goal of substantially reducing cost of prescription drugs for patients in all of Colorado's public and private sector insurance programs by eliminating the price-increasing prescription drug manager ("pbm") practice of prescription drug arbitrage and by creating a new, competitive marketplace for pbm services with transparent, competitive dollar-value pricing. Colorado aahca coalition organizations advocated for the urgency of prioritizing enactment of effective prescription drug affordability reforms in the next legislative session, commencing in 2025, and as a result of these efforts over the course of 2024, a bipartisan group of legislative leaders stepped forward as advocates and prospective sponsors in the Colorado legislature.- in Minnesota, aahca remobilized our advocacy campaign partner organizations who had won enactment of Minnesota's 2021 pbm reverse auction statute for the purpose of defending against a 2024 pbm industry-backed initiative to rexcind the reforms after they had redirected tens of millions of dollars per year of pbm gross revenues back to savings for Minnesota tax-payers and public employee families. During the extended session of the 2024 session of the Minnesota legislature, the advocacy and educational work of aahca and our campaign coalition partners ultimately succeeded in thwarting the attempt to rescind thr Minnesota's pbm reverse auction reform. - in Iowa, aahc, in coordination with our state coalition partners, provided technical support and advisement to officers of the state administration - aligned in goals with state legislators to whom aahca has provided advisement earlier in 2024 - with a common objective of implementing a competitive, technology-enabled pbm reverse aution process modeled on aahca principles that have captured billions of taxpayer dollars in prescription drug savings for state governments and public employee families in New Jersey, Colorado, and Minnesota. - the aahca coalition for medicare part d prescription drug market reforms has aimed its focus over the
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 95% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 96.6%; rating input score 97
- Program expense ratio: 98.4%; rating input score 98
- Fundraising efficiency: $0 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 95.7%; rating input score 96; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.7%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.33; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.9%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 33.9% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 27% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 19.5% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 96.6% of revenue deployed · 98.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 22 of 23 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $15.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $401K · 24 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $188K reported
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.