Amc Maine Woods Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
202034674
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2015
Forms available
Form 990 2015
Location
Boston, MA, USA
Phone
6175230636
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Forest Conservation

Reported finances

Revenue
$686,765
Expenses
$1,442,092
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • John Judge (President & CEO)
  • Walter Graff (Vice President)

Highest reported compensation

  • John Judge (President & CEO): $259,277 total reported compensation
  • Walter Graff (Vice President): $210,753 total reported compensation
  • Bruce Glabe (Treasurer / Secretary): $200,444 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Refer to Schedule O, Pages 33-34

What it reported doing in 2015

Maine Woods Initiative (MWI) Project Management and Operations - Maine Woods Initiative (MWI) Project Management and Operations Program actively promotes, preserves, and protects the natural resources and environment of the 100-Mile Wilderness region. As part of this program, MWInc owns and manages over 37,000 acres of working forest, inclusive of a 10,000-acre ecological reserve, commonly known as the Katahdin Iron Works (KIW) property.Maine Woods Initiative Project Management and Operations program also works with conservation partners and local communities to build grassroots support for priority conservation projects. The program *Refer to Schedule O, Page 31 for Continuation* Maine Woods Initiative (MWI) Project Management and Operations (Continued): participates in and comments on formal resource management programs and decisions at the local, state, and federal level; consults with industry and land owners to find equitable solutions to environment problems, advocates for state and federal land protection and trails funding, and facilitates public participation in local, state and federal environmental issues and policy. MWI participated in the public process to design tourist-related multi-business co-operative packages to facilitate a greater use of the recreational resources in the Moosehead Lake region. MWI also supports regional nature-based tourism through a collaborative GIS effort with local businesses and guides and provides directional and interpretive signage for state-recognized nature tourism sites.MWI works with young people each year through guided and self-guided programs designed to make the outdoors and the environment accessible and meaningful to youth from all socioeconomic backgrounds. We worked with a local education collaborative to provide schoolchildren winter recreation programs and support outdoor skills courses, using the KIW property as a hands-on learning resource. MWI also provided in-classroom environmental education to a number of local elementary schools.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 84% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 87
  • Transparency & Controls: 89
  • Accountability: 65
  • Sustainability: 8
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 93.1%; rating input score 93
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 40%; rating input score 40; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -110%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.5%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8.6% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 13% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -18.2% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 93.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 2 of 5 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $259K · 6 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2010 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 40/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.