Amateur Athletics Commission of Snohomish County
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 900136071
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2012, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- Everett, WA, USA
- Phone
- 4253092744
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $807,064
- Expenses
- $815,547
- Assets
- $137,741
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TAMMY DUNN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- TAMMY DUNN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $103,621 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Snohomish county sports commission (scsc) works to enhance snohomish county's economy, image as a premier sports destination, and way of life for its residents by attracting diverse regional, national and international sports events, assisting sports events and supporting development of sport facilities.
What it reported doing in 2025
In 2025, scsc received grant funds from the state of Washington to host regional events, assist local facilities to provide livestreaming of events, showcase various electronic game tournaments, provide funding for a local school for resurfacing of tennis courts, and to grow the local soccer club community. By providing funding to the various community entities, scsc will help promote the destination and tourism-related businesses in the area with local partners, help youth with career exploration, and inspire youth to play more sports in snohomish county and the greater puget sound region.scsc conducts an annual event to recognize and honor athletes, coaches, teams, and/or sports contributors, who have distinguished themselves in their sport or vocation on the state, national and/or international stage. The annual hall of fame banquet is the event at which these individuals and teams are inducted into the hall of fame. Hall of fame display cases are located at the angel of the winds arena in which memorabilia from these inductees is showcased.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 94% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 64% for direct work, and 36% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 89
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 79.2%; rating input score 79
- Program expense ratio: 78.3%; rating input score 78
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 97.8%; rating input score 98; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.1%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.17; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.7%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 34.3% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 13.5% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.8% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 79.2% of revenue deployed · 78.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $639K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $104K · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 28 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.