Amanda Hope Rainbow Angels
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 462522889
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 6027755090
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Patient Services - Entertainment, Recreation
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,463,310
- Expenses
- $1,316,189
- Assets
- $3,148,847
- Liabilities
- $249,493
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LORRAINE TALLMAN (FOUNDER, CEO PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- LORRAINE TALLMAN (FOUNDER, CEO PRESIDENT): $131,100 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our vision provide care and gifts to all children diagnosed with cancer and other life-threatening diseases. Support healthcare professionals in providing person-centered care to children and their families with empathy and understanding. Help families have voice and choice above harsh protocols often present in healthcare.
What it reported doing in 2025
On march 30, 2012, 1129am, amanda hope lost her battle to leukemia. In her honor, we formed our organization and are carrying out her vision of giving some dignity back to other terminally ill children with something as simple as a shirt designed for them. Our comfycozys adaptive apparel was designed by amanda. In her honor, amanda hope rainbow angels has been established to provide cancer warriors and their families with all of the hopes, dreams and wishes of this precious warrior, amanda hope amanda hope rainbow angels supports the, here and now, needs of families impacted by childhood cancer and other life-threatening diseases. The number of new warriors served in 2025 was 956. We assist families through our four main programs 1. Comfycozy care gifts we provide comfycozy for chemo care packs to our warriors, which include mindfulness kits for 1001 children in 2025. We celebrated 139 no more chemo party events.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 77% for direct work, and 23% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 55
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 72.5%; rating input score 73
- Program expense ratio: 77.2%; rating input score 77
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.38 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10.1%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.39; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 10%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 18.5% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.1% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 72.5% of revenue deployed · 77.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 15 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $131K · 15 people listed
- Consistency: 41 of 42 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2015 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 26/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 37/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.