Alzheimers Services of the East Bay

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
943081330
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2022
Forms available
Form 990 2022
Location
Berkeley, CA, USA
Phone
5106448292
Rating
66
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alzheimer's Disease

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,525,937
Expenses
$1,151,201
Assets
$867,220
Liabilities
$604,609

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Micheal Pope (CEO)
  • Wanda Wallis (President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Micheal Pope (CEO): $125,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of Alzheimer's Services of the East Bay is to provide services to individuals with Alzheimer's disease and other related dementia; provide support for their caregivers; and educate and inform the general community about issues related to dementia care.

What it reported doing in 2022

ASEB provides adult day health care and respite services to individuals suffering from Alzheimers disease and related dementias. ASEB offers three Adult Day Health Care (ADHC) programs, in Berkeley and Fremont. ASEB educates and informs providers, caregivers, professionals, and the general community about issues related to dementia care. ASEB's primary goal is to remain open and engaged in the community until ASEB can utilize its licensed capacity (ASEB is still following COVID protocols of social distancing; temperature taking; masks and hand washing/sanitizing). The COVID protocols have assisted ASEB in looking at the delivery of services. ASEB now offers two shifts of care to accommodate the number of people in the space. The shifts are 9am-1pm and 11am-3pm. ASEBs goal is to maintain this scheduling once we move out of the pandemic.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 44
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 53
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 35.2%; rating input score 35
  • Program expense ratio: 46.6%; rating input score 47
  • Fundraising efficiency: $82.91 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 24.6%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.75; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.7; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 10.9%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -9.6% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -6.7% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -8.2% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 35.2% of revenue deployed · 46.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $536K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $125K · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 35/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 47/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 11/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 33/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization has conflicting California charity-registration records.