Alvin Manvel Community Food Pantry

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
760809967
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Alvin, TX, USA
Phone
8324771975
Rating
42
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Food Banks, Pantries

Reported finances

Revenue
$92,854
Expenses
$54,209
Assets
$49,158
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LORETTA SMITH (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • STEPHANIE STINSON (EXECU DIRECTOR & TREASURER)
  • LORETTA SMITH (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • DANIEL STINSON (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Rooted in a legacy of service since 1980, the Alvin-Manvel Community Food Pantry is guided by compassion and stewardship, ensuring all in need have access to food and are treated with dignity and respect.

What it reported doing in 2025

1-night event titled "Taste and See" that invited sponsors to purchase sponsorship for tables, as well as, community members to purchase tickets. The event was held in a private location with heavy appetizers and wine served. Funds were received through silent auction items, 50/50 raffle, purchase of wine through a "wine wall" pull, as well as a live auction. During the live auction, a fund the need portion was also held where individuals pledged donations to the purchase of a new roof for the pantry. The funds raised were earmarked for a new roof since there were multiple areas leaking inside the building. Funds were also raised and earmarked for the repaving of the parking lot since there were multiple, large potholes that caused clients challenges with their vehicles while driving through the service line each week. Funds were also earmarked for repairs needed in the aging buildings (over 30 years old) such as floor, ceiling, and dock door repairs. Remaining funds were designated to

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 71% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 12
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 69
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 9.3%; rating input score 9
  • Program expense ratio: 16%; rating input score 16

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 41.6%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.91; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 9.3% of revenue deployed · 16% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $9K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 9/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 16/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.