Alumni Association of the Nu Delta Chapter of Phi Mu Delta Fraternity

Nonprofit profile at a glance

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

11 people listed

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Provide room and board to undergraduate members attending the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Boston area schools

Provided room and board to 12 members attending the Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Revenue model: No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model: Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Pay-setting controls: Limited
Foreign activity oversight: Limited
Grant itemization coverage: Limited
Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Related-party transparency: Limited

Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Operating margin: -439.5%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 30.4; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.34; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Program expense growth: Limited
Revenue growth: -10.2% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings

Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
Consistency: 11 of 12 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.
Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.