ALTRUSA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INC Altrusa International Foundation of Roswell NM Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
850371178
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2017
Location
Roswell, NM, USA
Phone
5756260567
Rating
47
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$84,812
Expenses
$36,250
Assets
$426,485
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Sheree Smyzenski (President)
  • Mary Ellen Johnston (President-Elect)

People named in this filing

  • Sheree Smyzenski (President)
  • Mary Ellen Johnston (President-Elect)
  • Shelby Corn (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Primary Exempt Purpose - Scholarships, Literacy & other Community project funding

What it reported doing in 2024

Literacy (Line 29a): $8470 Total ($5506.59 Books, arts & crafts and supplies for Free Little Libraries, replacing books lost in October 2024 Flood, Dr. Seuss Read Across America, Book Blitz, Books for Newborns at area hospitals; $1000 Eastern NM University Roswell Adult Education Services; $96.40 Tobosa's Los Pasitos Children's Fair; $500 Santa Elena Mission Library Project; $300 Roswell Public Library donation; $567.30 High Road Leadership for Teen Leadership Institute; $500 NM National Guard Youth ChalleNGe;)

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 86
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 57.3%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 11.77; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -13.6% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.