Alto Ladies 9 Hole Golf Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
753209094
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Alto, NM, USA
Phone
9727426809
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Human Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$34,103
Expenses
$36,886
Assets
$12,397

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • STEPHANIE SMITH (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • STEPHANIE SMITH (PRESIDENT)
  • JUNE MERRICK (VICE PRESIDE)
  • SANDY BARRON (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Alto9ga golf association's primary mission it to provide golfing opportunities for women interested in playing 9 rather than 18 holes of golf due to time constraints, skill level or physical limitations. Along with two tournaments a year and weekly play days, we also support other algcc associations with their tournamnets as well as supporting our local organizations with our donations toward community projects.

What it reported doing in 2025

Alto9ga golf association's primary mission it to provide golfing opportunities for women interested in playing 9 rather than 18 holes of golf due to time constraints, skill level or physical limitations. Along with two tournaments a year and weekly play days, we also support other algcc associations with their tournamnents as well as supporting our local organizations with our donations toward community projects. During the summer months we have one social a month to connect with other members outside the game of golf. The al9ga provides a unique and broad opportunity for the algcc members to get integrated into the local needs, fun and purpose.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 66% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 29
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -8.2%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.34; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -20.7% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -8.5% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.