Alston Beech Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 204968831
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022
- Location
- Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Phone
- 2157638824
- Rating
- 60
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $-7,477
- Expenses
- $72,722
- Assets
- $753,018
- Liabilities
- $3,500
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KENNETH SCOTT (PRESIDENT &)
Highest reported compensation
- KENNETH SCOTT (PRESIDENT &): $280,034 total reported compensation
- LARRY J GRIFFIN (TREASURER): $129,725 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide small program grants to area nonprofit organization whose mission is compatible with that of the foundation.
What it reported doing in 2022
Thealstonbeechfoundation(abf)wascreatedtoprovidesmallprogram grantstoareanonprofitorganizationswhosemissionis compatible withthatofabf.thegrantsprovidedwillcomplementandfoster otherrevitalizationefforts, whichwillultimatelyimprove thenorthcentralphiladelphiacommunity.communityreinvestmentwillmake thedifferencebetweendecayandgrowth, thatiswhyitis essentialforthefoundationtoprovidefundingopportunitiestoorganizati onsthatareprovidingneededprogramsorservicestothe arearesidents.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 44
- Accountability: 49
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 81.1%; rating input score 81
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 13.6%; rating input score 14; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 60%; rating input score 60; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1,072.6%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 10.35; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 29.2%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -6% per year; rating input score 0; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 81.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 5 board members independent · 3 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $59K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $280K · 5 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 19 of 20 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2011 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 14/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.