ALS Northwest

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
680516066
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Portland, OR, USA
Phone
5032385559
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Patient Services - Entertainment, Recreation

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,781,584
Expenses
$3,012,212
Assets
$4,393,568
Liabilities
$403,754

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

23 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JASON DRUCKER (President)
  • ROCKY DALLUM (Vice President)
  • AMY FRAZEY (Past President)

Highest reported compensation

  • CASSY ADAMS (Executive Dir.): $159,552 total reported compensation
  • AMY EASTON (DEVELOPMENT DIR.): $122,347 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Leading the fight to treat and cure als through global research and nationwide advocacy while also empowering people with als (lou gehrigs disease) and their families to live fuller lives by providing them with compassionate care and support.

What it reported doing in 2025

Outreach and advocacyals northwest provides ongoing financial support to support federal and state public policy initiatives to improve the lives of families living with als, outreach efforts to raise public awareness about als, as well as cutting edge global research working toward an effective treatment and ultimately a cure for als. The organization contributed to a national effort that funded significant projects to understand the cause of als, the disease mechanism, genetics, biomarkers for als, environmental factors, and translational research to move therapy ideas from the lab bench to therapy. Public policy accomplishments during the year ended january 31, 2026, include advocacy of people with als to connect with legislators in Washington dc to advocate for continued funding for the national als registry, the als research program at the department of defense, the act for als act and federal support for als research. Awareness events sponsored by the organization include walk als, ski als, ride als, may als awareness month, als research symposium, creation of public service announcements, mission connected social media, and creation of videos that illustrate what als is and how the organizations services can help.november national family caregiver month activities serve as opportunities to bring hope and community to people with als and their families. By coming together at awareness events, people with als and their families as well as those who have lost a loved one to als find strength and support with one another. The large number of people who participate in these efforts raise the profile of als across the region and engage community awareness of the services and resources available from als northwest. Research is a critical part of the organizations mission.as part of the effort to increase the knowledge of als and those affected, the organization promotes als events that promote the national als registry. This effort is vital to understand the full incidence and prevalence of als across Oregon and southwest Washington so that we can identify and strategically plan to serve as many families living with als in the northwest.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 84% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 73
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 29
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 85.4%; rating input score 85
  • Program expense ratio: 78.4%; rating input score 78
  • Fundraising efficiency: $8.35 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 98.1%; rating input score 98; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -8.3%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.46; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 9.4%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.3% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 85.4% of revenue deployed · 78.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 20 of 20 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $2.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $160K · 23 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $239K reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 32 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 29/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 35/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 50/100.