Alpha Womens Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
391752194
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Milwaukee, WI, USA
Phone
4144452273
Rating
39
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Arts, Culture, and Humanities N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$136,815
Expenses
$131,672
Assets
$166,862
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Thomas Loggans (Vice President)
  • Phil Ace (President)

People named in this filing

  • Thomas Loggans (Vice President)
  • John Wooden (Board Member)
  • Paul Hoover (Board Member)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide assistance in crisis pregnancy situations

What it reported doing in 2025

During the 4 th quarter, the center ministered to 21 new clients and 65 repeat clients for a total of 86 client contacts for the quarter. We gave 5 pregnancy tests and 3 were positive. We had no abortion-minded clients. We counseled 1 post-abortive client. We had 2 clients profess faith in Jesus Christ as their personal Savior. The full gospel was shared 39 times. Our annual numbers are as follows: 77 new clients and 256 repeat clients for a total of 333 client contacts this year. We gave 30 pregnancy tests, of which 15 were positive. We had ZERO abortion-minded clients. We counseled 5 post-abortive clients. We had 5 clients accept Christ as their personal Savior. We shared the full gospel 132 times. We averaged 48 clients in our Learn & Earn Bible Study Program.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 2
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 1.9%; rating input score 2
  • Program expense ratio: 2%; rating input score 2

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 3.8%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.27; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 33.3%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 28.9% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -4.8% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 1.9% of revenue deployed · 2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 2/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.