ALPHA SIGMA ALPHA SORORITY Nu Nu Chapter

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
236437785
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Indianapolis, IN, USA
Phone
3178712920
Rating
37
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$111,897
Expenses
$110,180
Assets
$59,951
Liabilities
$40,129

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Kriti Sundaresa (Chapter President)
  • Megan Kline (Collegiate Vice President of Programming)
  • Caitlyn Tagliareni (Collegiate Vice President of Membership Experience)
  • Taylor Clark (Collegiate Vice President of Recruitment)
  • Abi Weagraff (Collegiate Vice President of Education)
  • isabella Valdes (Collegiate Vice President of Communications)

People named in this filing

  • Kriti Sundaresa (Chapter President)
  • Megan Kline (Collegiate Vice President of Programming)
  • Caitlyn Tagliareni (Collegiate Vice President of Membership Experience)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Alpha Sigma Alpha promotes high ideals and standards for its members throughout their lives by emphasizing balance among our four aims of intellectual, physical, social and spiritual development.

What it reported doing in 2024

Leadership Training Conferences and Conventions - The sorority provides programming education and support for its members to enhance their individual, intellectual, character and leadership skills. This is done primarily through training sessions, conferences and a bi-annual convention.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.5%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.54; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.67; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 13.2% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -25.7% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.