Alpha Project
Legal name: Alpha Project for the Homeless
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 330215585
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- San Diego, California, US
- Phone
- 619-542-1877
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $41,585,915
- Expenses
- $40,609,337
- Assets
- $35,509,977
- Liabilities
- $4,319,133
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBERT MCELROY (CEO & PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- ROBERT MCELROY (CEO & PRESIDENT): $346,692 total reported compensation
- JAN NORBY (CFO): $304,925 total reported compensation
- JANICE WILLIAMS (CBDO): $248,113 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To serve community members
What it reported doing in 2024
Other ProgramsFood Services Program: Alpha Projects commercial kitchen at Alpha Square is instrumental in the delivery of food services to the agencys many programs including the preparation of over 200,000 hot meals annually to shelter residents. The program also helps stock the agencys three food pantries at Alpha Square, Alpha Lofts, and Luther Tower, as well as prepares food kits for clients moving into housing of their own and emergency food kits as needed for seniors, disabled, and chronically ill clients.Homeless Outreach: At the core of all of Alpha Projects facilities and services is a program of Homeless Outreach, designed not only to assist those in need in accessing needed services but also to assist the surrounding neighborhood in addressing homeless-related issues. Operating in the City of San Diego, City of Vista, Chula Vista City, National City, and the Port of San Diego, outreach workers are trained in crisis response and de-escalation, with access to food, transportation and a wealth of referral sources to help individuals and families still homeless connect with housing and other sources of support.Case Management at Luther Tower: Luther Tower offers 200 units of affordable housing to seniors. Alpha Projects Case Management services at Luther Tower offers residents with support accessing services and supplies including medical, behavioral health, food, as well as other wrap-arounds services. Hospice for the Homeless & Living with Dignity: In response to the homeless deaths that occur on the streets of San Diego, in 2007 Alpha Project launched Hospice for the Homeless and Living with Dignity to provide financial assistance to homeless people diagnosed with a terminal or chronic illness. Hospice for the Homeless caters to those diagnosed by a physician as having 6 months or less to live. While the clients chosen hospice provider delivers medical & nursing care, medications, social worker, and behavioral health and spiritual counseling, Alpha Project provides financial assistance including security deposit, rental assistance, furniture, food, and other supplies not covered by hospice. Living with Dignity provides one-time assistance to help seniors, those with physical disabilities or other debilitating illnesses with emergency or critical needs such as rental assistance, transportation, food, and mobility devices such as wheelchairs, walkers, walking sticks, etc.Alpha House: Alpha House is designed to provide sober living and transitional housing to those needing safe, clean, and affordable housing while transitioning back into the workforce through participation in Alpha Projects Special Projects work program.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 78% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 94
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.2%; rating input score 93
- Program expense ratio: 95.3%; rating input score 95
- Fundraising efficiency: $444.11 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.3%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.87; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 16.5% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 15.8% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 18.2% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 93.2% of revenue deployed · 95.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 5 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 6 filed program accomplishments · $38.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $347K · 15 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $513K reported
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 9 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 44/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Whistleblower policy not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.