Alpha Pregnancy Support Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 581918989
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Lexington, NC, USA
- Phone
- 3362421218
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Family Services for Adolescent Parents
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $176,860
- Expenses
- $215,126
- Assets
- $361,321
- Liabilities
- $255,556
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- AMY GRAHAM (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- TRACY NIFONG (PRESIDENT)
- REVERAND ALEX NANCE (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- AMY GRAHAM (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- TRACY NIFONG (PRESIDENT)
- REVERAND ALEX NANCE (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Alpha pregnancy support, inc. Is an organization of believers in jesus christ, led by god, to do a specific work...sharing care and love and support with women in a crisis pregnancy situation. We desire to look like jesus and display his character as we minister throughout our community.
What it reported doing in 2025
Crisis pregnancy support and counseling services
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 83% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 55
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 27
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 59.5%; rating input score 59
- Program expense ratio: 48.9%; rating input score 49
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -21.6%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.68; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.71; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 27.5%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.5% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 20.1% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 59.5% of revenue deployed · 48.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $105K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2016 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 49/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.