Alpha Phi Alpha Ira Dorsey Scholarship Endowment Fund Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 541726378
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Woodbridge, VA, USA
- Phone
- 5713101906
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $185,544
- Expenses
- $207,586
- Assets
- $850,848
- Liabilities
- $21,207
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Sidney Evans (President)
- Gerald Gladney (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Leo Brooks (Member)
- Anthony Walker (Member)
- Mark Ausbrook (Member)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
IDSEF was incorporated on June 9, 1994 and operates for educational, philanthropic and educational purposes. The guiding light of IDSEF is to provide scholarships, educational outreach and mentorship for college bound students in the Prince William and Southern Fairfax County areas in Virginia
What it reported doing in 2024
Black and Gold Scholarship Gala: 17 scholarships were awarded to new recipients and 3 renewable scholarships were awarded to previous years' scholarship recipients. Includes plaques and certificates presented to scholarship recipients at the gala.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 49% for direct work, and 51% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Accountability: 18
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 97.9%; rating input score 98
- Program expense ratio: 87.4%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.43 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 84.6%; rating input score 85; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 94.5%; rating input score 95; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -11.9%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.1; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 27.6% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 21.6% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.6% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 97.9% of revenue deployed · 87.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 21 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $181K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 21 people listed
- Consistency: 18 of 20 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 31/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.