Alpha Gamma Fraternity

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
386092680
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2021, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
East Lansing, MI, USA
Phone
8103100276
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$114,807
Expenses
$72,674
Assets
$481,746
Liabilities
$23,656

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • David Kipfmiller (President)
  • Scott Benzler (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Shaun Byron (Trustee)
  • Randall Lovejoy (Trustee)
  • Robert West (Trustee)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide a positive housing environment for the members of Tau Chapter of Alpha Gamma Rho at Michigan State University. To improve and maintain the facilities used by the Tau Chapter of Alpha Gamma Rho at Michigan State University. Assist alumni of Tau Chapter to stay connected with undergraduate chapter and Michigan State University.

What it reported doing in 2024

Provide housing for Tau Chapter of Alpha Gamma Rho. Revenue generated was from rent from Tau Chapter of Alpha Gamma Rho. Building maintenance and improvements were parking lot sealing, new living room and office features.Expense was maintenance, property taxes and insurance.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 84% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 81
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 63.3%; rating input score 63
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 36.7%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.63; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -11.7% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 12.9% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 63.3% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $73K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 30/100.