Alpha Delta Corp of Flint

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237060106
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Flint, MI, USA
Phone
9475174690
Rating
40
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$68,248
Expenses
$36,875
Assets
$334,261
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • TU LE (TREASURER)
  • DAVID JARVIS (CHAIRMAN)
  • JORDAN SYROWIK (VICE CHAIRMAN)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Form 990-EZ, Part III, Primary Exempt Purpose: The primary purpose of Alpha Delta Corp of Flint(AD) is owning and maintaining the Phi Delta Theta Michigan Delta Chapter(PDT) of Kettering University in Flint, Michigan. AD also takes an active role in various activities and other functions of PDT, including attending virtual and in-person Housing Board (Alpha Delta Board) meetings, any required PDT new officer and mid-year training, participation in the Chapter's philanthropy events, participation in Works Weekend (weekend dedicated to housing projects), dinners and other less formal events. The interactions and fellowship among members of AD and the members of the PDT aid in fulfilling another purpose for which AD was formed, i.e., the promotion and fostering of the principles and ideals of the Fraternity and its social activities. These activities will take approximately 10% of AD's time. These activities will be conducted by the members of Alpha Delta Corp of Flint (AD).

What it reported doing in 2025

Filing Winter/Summer taxes, Reinstating tax ID, Annual fire suppression checks/updates, Liability Insurance, Property Insurance, funding new furniture (chairs, wardrobes, mattresses, and bunk beds)

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 74% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 83
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 46%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.06; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 26.5% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 27.2% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.