Alpha Community Foundation of Oklahoma

Legal name: Alpha Community Foundation of Okla

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
861339855
IRS 990 coverage
2022–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Oklahoma City, OK, United States
Phone
4056577800
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Human Services N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$288,438
Expenses
$221,568
Assets
$2,290,504
Liabilities
$116,090

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

People named in this filing

  • ANTHONY E DANIELS (BOARD MEMBER)
  • BRIAN EAKERS (SECRETARY)
  • COLYN MOSS (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Founded in 2021, the Alpha Community Foundation of Oklahoma (ACF) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit dedicated to empowering communities across the state to improve health outcomes, expand educational opportunities, promote civic engagement, and provide direct support to those in need. Founded in 2021, the Alpha Community Foundation of Oklahoma (ACF) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit dedicated to empowering communities across the state. ACF focuses on historically underserved neighborhoods—especially in Northeast Oklahoma City—to improve health outcomes, expand educational opportunities, promote civic engagement, and provide direct support to those in need. At the heart of ACF’s mission is the Garden Oaks Community Center, located in Northeast Oklahoma City. Once a vacant public school, it has been transformed into a vibrant, 27,000-square-foot facility on 10 acres. More than $2 million has been raised...

What it reported doing in 2024

Passed out 500 turkeys tutored 3500 kids conducted one-on-one tutoring services to 35 7-8 grade students in reading, writing and math in low income neighborhoods. Completed over 250 hours of tutoring. Hosted 5 in-school career education programs at various Oklahoma city public schools exposing students to different career fields, serving 40 students in total. Conducted 2 health and wellness workshops covering the topics of nutrition, exercise, stress reduction and disease prevention to 150 attendees conducted a community health fair with over 200 attendees, featuring health screening, informational booths and healthy living demonstrations hosted a series of walking classes with 50 participants in total passed out 500 turkeys tutored 3500 kids

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 53
  • Transparency & Controls: 91
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 75
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 50.7%; rating input score 51
  • Program expense ratio: 66%; rating input score 66
  • Fundraising efficiency: $4.86 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 23.2%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 10.34; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 57.7% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -20.5% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12.6% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 50.7% of revenue deployed · 66% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $146K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 22 of 23 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 51/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 21/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule G fundraiser detail did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.