Alpha Chi Alpha Fraternity

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
020241594
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Hanover, NH, USA
Phone
5164130315
Rating
97
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Student Sororities, Fraternities

Reported finances

Revenue
$84,451
Expenses
$81,760
Assets
$108,551
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

26 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Bryan Akin (President eff 3/2025)
  • JJ F Dega (Vice President eff 3/2025)
  • George Richards (President end 3/2025)
  • Jon Pazen (Vice President end 3/2025)

People named in this filing

  • Bryan Akin (President eff 3/2025)
  • JJ F Dega (Vice President eff 3/2025)
  • Arjun Anand (Treasurer eff 3/2025)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The joining together of men to encourage individuality and personal growth. The network of support that this brotherhood provides shall extend beyond the immediate membership of Alpha Chi Alpha to the broader Dartmouth Community. Specific goals of the brotherhood are: A. The goal of scholarship shall be to encourage intellectual curiosity and to strive for academic excellence; B. The goal of service shall be to reach out to the local community through various projects on individual, as well as, on a group level; C. The goals of culture and social welfare shall be to strive for diversity, and to provide a wide array of programming events and activities in conjunction with other organizations on this campus.

What it reported doing in 2025

College Fraternity: Personal growth of the fraternity's brothers, and a positive environment for the traditions and ideals of Dartmouth College and of the brotherhood.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 98
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 54
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 96.8%; rating input score 97
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 3.2%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.33; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 96.8% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $82K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 26 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2014 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.